This
case is very difficult to understand for me personally because there a lot of
factors that go into it. This is about an LDS General Authority, Elder Durrant,
who spoke in general conference on “ponderizing”, which is pondering the
scriptures and memorizing a verse from the scriptures. I thought that the whole
“ponderize” term is very clever, and apparently Elder Durrant’s son thought
that it was clever too, so much that he created a website where you could buy merchandise
that had “ponderize” on it, as well as a Facebook page on the subject.
After this website and Facebook
page were created, there was a lot of backlash from people who were suspicious
and saw the whole thing as a way for them to make money for personal gain. After
this happened, his son made a post that said that all profits would go to a
missionary fund. This only caused people to be more suspicious, questioning why
that wasn’t said in the first place. The fact that the statement was only made
after the backlash also makes me question if all profits really were intended
to go to the missionary fund. You can read more about the whole scandal HERE as
well as what was done by Elder Durrant to address the issue.
This whole social media case is
just another example of how fast something can spread on social media and how
fast there can be negative reactions if you aren’t careful. Things like this
happen all the time on social media and this article from CNN presents many
different incidents of it happening with celebrities. Overall, this can be a
lesson for everyone to always think of what can happen in result of whatever
you post on social media for everyone to see. The fact that everyone can see
it, and not everyone will think of it as a positive thing, should always be in
the back of your mind.
I agree with you when you say that this case was hard to understand. However, I feel like this case didn't take into account both sides of the story. I thhink you did a great job presenting examples of this and analyzing the case itself.
ReplyDeleteGood job! I thought this was a weird case as well.
ReplyDelete